Zotero versus Mendeley
These are free, easy to use and convenient reference management applications to help you save, organise and store your references.
They allow you to create in-text citations and bibliographies, and both offer a desktop and online access.
But which one is the best for you?
The I&LS team has done a bit of research to find out how these two products compare. But deciding which one to use will depend on your preferences and working style…
| Access | Desktop and online. Works with IE, Firefox, Chrome and Safari. | Online: on Firefox browser with plug-in installed. A desktop version – Zotero Standalone – works with Chrome and Safari. |
| Free online storage | 1GB personal space + 100MB shared | 100MB |
| Additional storage cost |
|
|
| Annotation | Integrated PDF viewer (highlights and annotates files). Plus you can attach notes to items | You can attach note/tags to items and add notes to collections |
| Rich text notes | No | Yes |
| Compatibility/mobile version | Mendeley Lite app for iPad/iPhone.Third party apps for Android | Only third party apps: ZotPad, BibUp, Zandy, Scanner for Zotero, ZotFile |
| Citation count | No | Yes – Zotero Scholar Citations plugin for Firefox version only |
| Search for full-text within Cambridge | Yes, but only when using the online version | Yes, using a proxy server available from UL |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Weaknesses | Unreliable web importer | Limited free online storage |
| Exporting directly from databases (save as you browse) |
|
|
The above information is correct @ 25/10/2012. Please do come and talk to us if you would like advice in person.
Post updated by:
Natasha Pivnenko
Information & Library Assistant
Image by radarxlove
Previous entry Checkin when you’re checking out!
Next entry Qualtrics: your questions answered







