Most Novel and Best Paper Prize from the Strategy Process Interest Group of the Strategic Management Society (SMS).

Cambridge Judge paper on tackling grand challenges wins SMS prize

28 October 2026

The article at a glance

A paper co-authored by 2 faculty members of Cambridge Judge Business School received the Most Novel and Best Paper Prize from the Strategy Process Interest Group of the Strategic Management Society (SMS).

Category: Faculty news News

The paper co-authored by Shaz Ansari, Professor of Strategy and Innovation, and Madeleine Rauch, Associate Professor in Strategy and International Business, received the award on 19 October at the 46th annual conference of the SMS in Berlin. 

Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari.
Professor Shaz Ansari
Madeleine Rauch.
Dr Madeleine Rauch

3 key mechanisms identified 

The winning paper, entitled Propellant organising amid politicised and polarised conditions, identifies 3 mechanisms through which organising by a spinoff entity unfolds to help tackle society’s grand challenges: 

  • negotiated infusing of new activities with mission meaning
  • calibrating parent-spinoff distance 
  • leveraging parent-spinoff differences

“Organisations tackling grand challenges in fragmented, politicised, and polarised environments face a persistent tension: complex problems require dynamic experimentation, yet institutional rigidity constrains organisational change,” says the paper. “Drawing on a 13-year study of an Indian nonprofit, we develop a process model of propellant organising: the strategic creation and orchestration of temporary spinoffs that enable experimentation while preserving parent legitimacy.”  

Helping organisations practically 

The practical implications of the study are 2-fold: 

  1. Providing a model demonstrating how organisations can over time sequence experimentation, legitimacy protection and organisational reintegration. 
  2. Demonstrating how organisations build and communicate social engagement through different combinations of product, process and profit orientation – as such tools help organisations navigate “competing demands of social innovation, organisational survival and legitimacy preservation”. 

The authors conclude: “Our findings suggest that in restrictive environments, effective organising for grand challenges depends on the capacity to sequence, contain, and relinquish organisational forms as legitimacy conditions shift.” 

This article was published on

28 October 2026.